Operators
Most operators are infix operators: they have two operands, a left-hand side (lhs) operand and a right-hand side operand (rhs).
An infix operator can either have whitespace before and after the operator or have no whitespace neither before nor after the operator.
Infix operators have a precedence that indicate how strongly they bind to their operand and a left or right associativity.
A few operators are prefix operators: they only have a right-hand side. Prefix operators are followed immediately by their operand: they cannot be separated by whitespace.
A postfix operator (!, Factorial) has only a left-hand side and follows it
immediately: like a prefix operator, it cannot be separated from its operand by
whitespace.
The whitespace rules are necessary to support unambiguous parsing of expressions spanning multiple lines without requiring a separator between expressions
The implementation's source of truth for operator spelling, precedence, and
associativity is src/epsil/operators.ts. Both the parser and serializer read
that table. The reference table below mirrors it.
Precedence
The operator at the root of the parse tree has the lowest precedence.
Precedence tiers are numbered in gaps of 10, loosest to tightest — a
higher number binds tighter. Operators in the same tier have the same
precedence (for example + and -, or * and /).
| Tier | Operator | ASCII | Fancy | Kind | Associativity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Assign | := | infix | right | |
| — | Assign or Equal | = | infix | positional | |
| 15 | MapsTo | |-> | ↦ | infix | right |
| 18 | Coalesce | ?? | infix | right | |
| 20 | Pipe | |> | infix | left | |
| 20 | Pipe | ~> | infix | left | |
| 30 | KeyValuePair | -> | → | infix | left |
| 40 | Or | || | ⋁ | infix | left |
| 50 | And | && | ⋀ | infix | left |
| 60 | Equal | == | infix | n-ary chain | |
| 60 | Same | === | ≣ | infix | n-ary chain |
| 60 | NotEqual | != | ≠ | infix | n-ary chain |
| 60 | Less | < | infix | n-ary chain | |
| 60 | Greater | > | infix | n-ary chain | |
| 60 | LessEqual | <= | ⩽ | infix | n-ary chain |
| 60 | GreaterEqual | >= | ⩾ | infix | n-ary chain |
| 60 | Element | in | ∈ | infix | n-ary chain |
| 60 | Element (type test) | is | infix | ||
| 60 | NotElement | !in | ∉ | infix | n-ary chain |
| 65 | Range | .. | ‥ | infix | left |
| 70 | Add | + | infix | left | |
| 70 | Subtract | - | − | infix | left |
| 80 | Multiply | * | × | infix | left |
| 80 | Divide | / | ÷ | infix | left |
| 80 | Mod | % | infix | left | |
| 90 | Negate | - | − | prefix | |
| 90 | Not | ! | ¬ | prefix | |
| 100 | Power | ^ | infix | right | |
| 100 | Power | ** | infix | right | |
| 110 | Factorial | ! | postfix |
Postfix calls and indexing (f(x), xs[i]) bind tighter than every entry in
this table — they are handled directly by the parser rather than through the
operator table, since they are not spelled with an operator symbol.
The conditional expression a if c else b is not an operator row either, but
it has a place in this order: between KeyValuePair (30) and Or (40), so it
binds looser than every operator that computes and tighter than the forms that
bind or pair (=, |->, |>, ->). See
Control Flow.
The whitespace rule
An infix operator must have whitespace on both sides or on neither side. A prefix operator must have no whitespace before its operand. These rules let a multi-line program parse deterministically without a separator between every expression:
a + b // infix Add: ["Add", "a", "b"]
a+b // same: whitespace on neither side
a +b
Here + has whitespace before but not after: it is not treated as infix.
The expression a ends there; +b is left over on the same line with no
separator before it, which is a diagnostic (unexpected-symbol) rather than a
silently-inferred sequence — see Statements and Sequencing.
On its own line (after a linebreak or ;), +b is a valid new statement:
unary + is the identity, so a\n+b parses as ["Block", "a", "b"].
a+ b
Here + has whitespace after but not before: an asymmetric case. The
parser recovers as infix Add but reports an
asymmetric-operator-whitespace diagnostic (with a fix-it), since this is
more useful to the author than silently ending the statement.
Pipe: |> and ~>
|> and ~> are aliases for Pipe and sit at the loosest precedence
tier, right below Assign — looser than arithmetic, relational, and boolean
operators (Elixir-style):
a + b |> f // (a + b) |> f
a || b |> f // (a || b) |> f
x = a |> f // x = (a |> f)
Absence coalescing: ??
a ?? b is Coalesce(a, b): the value of a unless a is absent
(Missing or NaN), in which case the value of b. It is lazy — b is not
evaluated when a is present.
let timeout = config.timeout ?? 30
let first = xs[1] ?? 0
?? discharges absence. It does not rescue an Error: an error operand
is an error, not a missing value, and propagates.
It is right-associative, so a chain falls through left to right:
a ?? b ?? c // Coalesce(a, Coalesce(b, c))
Its precedence (18) sits between |-> and |>, which fixes the two groupings
that matter:
xs |> f ?? 0 // (xs |> f) ?? 0 — the default is for the pipeline's RESULT
x |-> x.a ?? 0 // x |-> (x.a ?? 0) — the default is inside the body
Like |>, it is looser than ->, so a dictionary value needs parentheses:
{a -> 1, b -> x ?? 2}
Write {a -> 1, b -> (x ?? 2)} instead. It is also looser than || and &&
(the C# position), so a ?? b || c is a ?? (b || c).
Type test: is
x is integer tests at runtime whether a value inhabits a type. It is the
same test a match type pattern performs, and lowers to the same
Element(value, type) expression:
x is integer
x is string && y is boolean
The right operand is a type name, not an expression, so a typo is a
parse-time diagnostic rather than a comparison against an undeclared symbol.
This first version resolves simple named types only: a compound type
(!error, integer | string, list<integer>) parses but reports
type-pattern-unsupported, exactly as the equivalent typed pattern does.
is is a contextual word, not a reserved one — it is recognized only
between an operand and a type name, so let is = 5 and f(is) remain legal.
Since is and in spell the same Element expression, a program serialized
back from MathJSON uses in for both.
Anonymous functions: |->
The mapsto operator constructs an anonymous function:
x |-> x^2
(x, y) |-> x + y
It is right-associative, so x |-> y |-> x + y constructs a function that
returns another function. It binds tighter than assignment but more loosely
than the other expression operators, so f = x |-> x + 1 assigns the complete
function to f. Typed parameters can be written in parentheses:
(x: integer) |-> x + 1
The MapsTo name in the table is internal to parsing. The resulting MathJSON
uses Function, not a MapsTo head.
Ranges: ..
The range operator is a compact spelling of a two-argument Range:
1..5 // Range(1, 5)
1..n - 1 // Range(1, n - 1)
k in 1..5 // k in Range(1, 5)
It binds tighter than relational operators and more loosely than addition and
subtraction. The Unicode two-dot leader ‥ is an input alias. Serialization
uses Range(a, b), and a stepped range continues to use the three-argument
call Range(a, b, step).
Spread: ...
In a call argument list — and only there — a prefix ... spreads a tuple
into the call's arguments: the tuple's elements become ordinary positional
arguments.
f(...t) // ["f", ["Spread", "t"]]
f(1, ...t, q) // splices between positional arguments
g(...p, ...q) // several spreads splice in order
Max(...t) // variadic built-ins accept spreads
Only tuples spread — a List (or any other value) is an
incompatible-type error. A literal tuple splices immediately; a symbolic
argument is spliced when the call evaluates, and until then the call stays
symbolic (the spread never binds positionally to a single parameter). The
three-dot token is distinct from the range operator ..; outside an argument
list ... is a diagnostic.
Unary prefix: - and !
- (Negate) and ! (Not) are prefix operators. They must abut their
operand with no whitespace:
-x // ["Negate", "x"]
!a // ["Not", "a"]
!!a // ["Not", ["Not", "a"]] — `!!` lexes as one token that peels into two Not's
Negate/Not bind looser than Power, so a leading minus does not reach
inside an exponent:
-x^2 // -(x^2), i.e. ["Negate", ["Power", "x", 2]]
A unary minus applied directly to a number literal folds into the literal
rather than producing a Negate node:
-2 // the literal -2, not ["Negate", 2]
Unary + is accepted the same way but is the identity: +(2 + 1) is
["Add", 2, 1], not wrapped in anything.
Power: ^ and **
Power is the tightest operator in the table and is right-associative.
** is an accepted alias for ^ (same table row, same precedence):
x^2 // ["Power", "x", 2]
x**2 // ["Power", "x", 2]
2^3^2 // ["Power", 2, ["Power", 3, 2]] — right-associative
Because Power binds tighter than Multiply/Divide:
x^1/2 // (x^1)/2, i.e. ["Divide", ["Power", "x", 1], 2]
Modulo: %
% is Mod, an infix operator at the multiplicative tier (the same
precedence as * and /), left-associative:
a % b // ["Mod", "a", "b"]
a + b % c // a + (b % c): ["Add", "a", ["Mod", "b", "c"]]
a % b % c // ["Mod", ["Mod", "a", "b"], "c"] — left-associative
Factorial: postfix !
! in postfix position is Factorial. Position disambiguates it from the
prefix ! (Not): a ! that abuts the preceding operand is a factorial
(x!), while a ! at the start of an operand is Not (!x).
5! // ["Factorial", 5]
n! // ["Factorial", "n"]
!x // ["Not", "x"] — prefix, unchanged
Factorial binds tighter than Power (tier 110 vs. 100), so it reaches inside
a Power operand, and a leading minus stays outside it:
2^3! // 2^(3!): ["Power", 2, ["Factorial", 3]]
3! ^ 2 // (3!)^2: ["Power", ["Factorial", 3], 2]
-3! // -(3!): ["Negate", ["Factorial", 3]]
It also applies after a parenthesized expression, a call, or an index:
(a + b)! // ["Factorial", ["Add", "a", "b"]]
f(x)! // ["Factorial", ["f", "x"]]
Like a prefix operator, a postfix ! must abut its operand: x! is a
factorial, but x !y is not — the space before ! ends the x expression,
leaving !y (a prefix Not) with no separator, which is a diagnostic. Because
the lexer maximal-munches a run of operator characters into one token, a !
directly followed by another operator character is not seen as a lone !
(write 3! ^ 2, not 3!^2; x! + 1, not x!+1). The != (NotEqual) and
!in (NotElement) operators are unaffected: the lexer keeps != whole and
!in is recognized as a compound before the postfix !.
Invisible multiplication
A number literal immediately followed — with no whitespace — by a symbol
or an opening parenthesis is read as an implicit Multiply:
2x // ["Multiply", 2, "x"]
3x^3 // 3·(x^3): ["Multiply", 3, ["Power", "x", 3]]
2i // ["Multiply", 2, "i"] — `i` is the engine's ImaginaryUnit symbol
2(2 + 1) // ["Multiply", 2, ["Add", 2, 1]]
Note that a symbol immediately followed by ( is a function call, not an
invisible multiplication: x(2+1) is ["x", ["Add", 2, 1]], and a
parenthesized (or otherwise compound) callee produces Apply:
(a+b)(2+1) is ["Apply", ["Add", "a", "b"], ["Add", 2, 1]]. See
Calls and Indexing.
Whitespace between the number and the symbol suppresses invisible
multiplication and is instead a statement boundary: 2 1/2 is a diagnostic
(unexpected-symbol), not 2 * (1/2).
Chained relational operators
Relational operators (precedence tier 60) are n-ary chainable: a run of the same relational operator flattens into one node, matching how mathematicians write inequalities and how the engine already represents them:
a < b < c // ["Less", "a", "b", "c"]
A mix of relational operators initially lowers as a left-associated tree:
a < b <= c // ["LessEqual", ["Less", "a", "b"], "c"]
When the tree is boxed by the Compute Engine, it is canonicalized to the
pairwise conjunction a < b && b <= c. Consequently, evaluating a mixed chain
has the usual mathematical chained-comparison semantics.
Logic operators
&&(And),||(Or),!(Not), with the fancy Unicode forms⋀,⋁,¬.&&binds tighter than||, matching the tiers above.
The word forms and, or, and not, and the implication/equivalence infix
operators => and <=>, are reserved but not implemented. The token => is
used contextually to separate a match pattern from its result.
Assignment vs. equality
Three spellings, two meanings:
:=always assigns.==always compares (and===isSame, structural identity).=is positional. It assigns when it is the top-level operator of a statement whose left side is a binding target — a name, or a field/index path rooted at one. Everywhere else it compares.
So a statement assigns:
x = 5
count = count + 1
…while the same = inside any larger expression is an equation, which is what
a reader of mathematics expects:
Solve(x^2 = 4, x) // Equal — the equation, not an assignment
if a = true { 1 } else { 2 }
[a = 1, b = 2]
This is why = needs no parentheses to be safe in a condition: if a = true
cannot silently assign, and the C footgun does not exist in Epsil.
As a comparison, = binds at the relational tier (60) like ==, so
if x = 5 && y groups as (x = 5) && y. As an assignment it binds loosest
(10), taking the whole right-hand side.
Two consequences worth knowing:
A non-binding left side compares, even as a statement. x^2 = 4 on its own
line is the equation, because x^2 is not a name. A bare name always assigns,
so write == when you mean the equation:
y == 2 * x + 1 // the equation
y = 2 * x + 1 // assigns to y
A chain is diagnosed. a = b = 5 would assign a the boolean b == 5,
which is never what a chained assignment means:
a = b = 5
Write a := b := 5 to chain the assignment, or a = (b = 5) if the comparison
really was intended.
A tuple pattern with a bare = is diagnosed. A parenthesized left side is
not a binding target, so (a, b) = (b, a) is a comparison of two tuples
whose result is discarded — the swap it looks like silently does nothing:
(a, b) = (b, a)
Write (a, b) := (b, a) to
destructure, or == if the
comparison really was intended. The diagnostic is narrow: it fires only when
the left side is shaped exactly like a destructuring pattern (bare names, _,
nested tuples), so a genuine tuple equation with computed components —
(x + 1, y) = t — stays silent.
An assignment in a condition is a warning. := is unconditional, so it
reaches a condition where a bare = no longer can — and Epsil has no
if init; cond form, so the assigned value is the test:
if flag := true { 1 } // warning: assign-in-condition
It is a warning rather than an error, since := is the deliberate spelling.
It fires only where a value is consumed as a boolean — an if/while
condition — not for f(a := 1) or [a := 1], which are unambiguous.
Serialization uses the explicit spellings. An expression written back out
by the formatter or serializer always uses := for assignment and == for
comparison, never a bare = — so a round-trip is exact regardless of position.
= is an input convenience.